Are there industry standards for hierarchy in selecting which performer is considered Artist vs. the Album Artist and how does it shift in accordance to genre?
No.
For digital music managment software, the main purpose of 'Album Artist' is to make it possible to group tracks that have the same 'album title' and 'album artist' together and present them as an 'album'.
In my opinion the concept of 'album artist' differs a lot between popular music and classical music.
For popular music it is usually very simple. The album artist will be a band, a solo artist, or 'various artists'.
Classical music is a completely different animal.
Bach never composed a work so that it could be released as an album.
None of the classical composers did that.
If you look at physical classical cd/lp releases you will see that often something like an 'album artist' is not even mentioned/printed.
My own system for classical music is that I pretty much completely ignore any 'album artist' and 'album title' that a database or a record company is using/pushing.
My 'album artists' will depend on what I feel defines the 'work' as a whole the best.
Sometimes it will be <composer> - <conductor>
Sometimes it will be <composer> - <ensemble>
Sometimes it will be only the <ensemble> (Kronos Quartet)
Sometimes it will be only the <conductor> (Wilhelm Furtwängler box sets)
Sometimes it will be only the main performer. (Sviatoslav Richter)
I am using anything that I feel makes the most sense, and I am ignoring anything that is used for physical releases such as lp's and cd's, or digital releases. I don't care much about what they say.
(side note - does the forum have a way to see when a specific thread has a response?)
Yes, click the 'Notify' button at the top.