I'm thinking in this for some time...
When we use the arithmetic mean for calculating the album rating we are considering all the tracks have the same duration. And i consider an album with 40 minutes of 4 stars songs better than a album with a single of 4 minutes with 4 stars.
The way of showing stars for album ratings is very imprecise, it needs more accuracy, so when seeing albums, instead of stars i would preffer seeing points for better sorting, and those points would be the adding of the multiply of time by stars, like the following formula:
Album rating= (Time with 5 star)*5+(Time with 4.5 star)*4.5+(Time with 4 star)*4+(Time with 3.5 star)*3.5+...
The time could be 1 minute, fractions of 30 seconds, or any fraction which would give us the sufficient precise results
There are albums with many songs of very few seconds, for example Marilyn Manson has 99 tracks, many of them of 2 seconds. Would be good to have an option to choose how many stars should be considered the non rated tracks. Each of us has a different rating criteria, for me two stars is a normal song, for others is three, and others don't rate the intro/outro songs.
Tell me your thoughts community