1
MusicBee Wishlist / Re: Add a search field to the settings
« on: January 19, 2023, 03:24:37 PM »
+1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
you are using (probably, very) old version of plugin. i'd recommend to you to update it.
btw, if you was using this plugin, when your issue was happening, check if no other ASR presets are ticked for auto-applying. maybe some ASR preset is modifying display artist tag:
@TomK7104, i can't reproduce this mb behavior, mb writes only 1st artist to display artist on my pc.
just as a workaround, you could install this plugin. select all tracks in your library (ctrl+A), right-click on them and select "additional tagging tools> multiple search & replace". set up MSR command as in screenshot below:
@TomK7104, right-click on any track, which has display artist as multiple artists separated by ";" select "edit", then click "tag inspector". how multiple artists are written to id3 tags? as multiple ARTIST tags or as single ARTIST tag in the form "artsis1; artist2; artist3; etc"? or better, post a screenshot of tag inspector.
Far as I know 'display artist' is a MusicBee exclusive 'invention'.
And I believe it is written (when absent) as soon as you save a file.
So it would be interesting to learn how the OP writes his artist tags and what audio format/tagging protocol he is using.
I have an opinion, which is that it's useless as a suggestion because the situation is more easily rectified by the users who have files that are tagged insufficiently for their uses than by the programmer of the project.
I typed in because that's what I wanted MB to use when scrobbling.
Correcting incorrectly tagged files can seem daunting, but if you take it in segments it will probably be less labor intensive than you fear.
IMO Steven's limited time shouldn't be taken up programming workarounds for people's mistagged files, but I'm not the final arbiter of that, just a voice among many.
Posting the same thing over and over again doesn't make it more likely to be implemented.